 Methodology
 Open access
 Published:
Three algorithms and SAS macros for estimating power and sample size for logistic models with one or more independent variables of interest in the presence of covariates
Source Code for Biology and Medicine volume 9, Article number: 24 (2014)
Abstract
Background
Commonly when designing studies, researchers propose to measure several independent variables in a regression model, a subset of which are identified as the main variables of interest while the rest are retained in a model as covariates or confounders. Power for linear regression in this setting can be calculated using SAS PROC POWER. There exists a void in estimating power for the logistic regression models in the same setting.
Methods
Currently, an approach that calculates power for only one variable of interest in the presence of other covariates for logistic regression is in common use and works well for this special case. In this paper we propose three related algorithms along with corresponding SAS macros that extend power estimation for one or more primary variables of interest in the presence of some confounders.
Results
The three proposed empirical algorithms employ likelihood ratio test to provide a user with either a power estimate for a given sample size, a quick sample size estimate for a given power, and an approximate power curve for a range of sample sizes. A user can specify odds ratios for a combination of binary, uniform and standard normal independent variables of interest, and or remaining covariates/confounders in the model, along with a correlation between variables.
Conclusions
These user friendly algorithms and macro tools are a promising solution that can fill the void for estimation of power for logistic regression when multiple independent variables are of interest, in the presence of additional covariates in the model.
Introduction
The purpose of this work is to propose and demonstrate the %LRpowerCorr10 algorithm (and two related algorithms) which estimates power and sample size for logistic models in settings where one or more predictors are of primary interest (Additional file 1). Additionally, covariates (confounders) may be present in the model. All the potential predictors can have a specified correlation structure and may be from a mixture of different univariate distributions, namely normal, uniform, and binomial. The user inputs several conjectured attributes including sample size, correlation, and odds ratios for association between independent variables and the outcome, and the result is an estimate of power. Two other related algorithms are also described. In short, a second algorithm, %Quickpower provides the inverse of %LRpowerCorr10, that is, sample size for a given power. A third algorithm, %LRpowerCorr10C provides an approximate power curve for a given range of sample sizes.
Background
The motivation for this work stems from methods that are in use to estimate power and sample size for standard linear regression models [1–4]. The MULTREG statement within SAS PROC POWER [1, 5] allows the investigator to determine the power to detect significance for a model with set of primary predictors of interest in the presence of covariates which are included in the model, but not of primary interest. For example, suppose an investigator proposes a linear model with four total predictors X1, X2, X3, and X4 but is primarily interested in X1 and X2 while controlling for X3 and X4. To power this setting the full model would be:
while the reduced model would be:
This corresponds to testing the null hypothesis:
in the full model. In the best case scenario to accurately estimate power, we would like to know the difference in the Rsquare of the full model and Rsquare for the reduced model. As an illustration, the short SAS code below would return a power value of 0.864.
SAS code
The MULTREG statement works nicely, but requires estimates of Rsquared that investigators may not know in advance. However, with some matrix algebra investigators can arrive at estimates for the Rsquared for both the full and reduced models if they can provide a set of assumed correlations between each predictor X and Y, along with assumed correlations among each of the variables X. The details follow. Rsquared can be expressed with the matrix expression,
where ρ_{ yx } is the 1 x p vector of simple correlations between each of the individual p predictors and the response variable y, and {R}_{xx}^{1} is the inverse of the p x p correlation matrix among each of the predictors. Next, one can calculate Rsquare for the reduced model by doing the identical calculation with the removal of the predictors of interest from the rows of ρ_{ yx } and the rows and columns of {R}_{xx}^{1}. An example of these calculations is as follows,
where the leading row vector is the set of simple correlations of Y with each of the four predictors X1, X2, X3, and X4. The middle matrix is the correlation of all four predictors X1, X2, X3, X4 among themselves, and the last column vector is the transpose of the leading vector. The correlation values are from a particular data set and are intended for demonstration. If we are interested in investigating power for X1 and X2 while controlling for X3 and X4 we would use the calculation,
in which it can be seen that the first two columns of the leading vector and the first two rows and columns of the middle matrix (which correspond to X1 and X2) have been omitted. The difference in these two calculations results in,
which represents another approach to providing the difference in Rsquares, a quantity needed in order to calculate power for this regression model setting. A corresponding set of calculations can be done for any size set of p predictors with a set of predictors of interest with the compliment of this set representing the predictors that are serving for controls. It is a reasonable approach in that researchers in many instances will have some idea of the simple correlations among the response and the predictors before their study, so this approach does have its merit.
Our objective was to provide a power estimation method for logistic regression settings that work in a somewhat corresponding manner to the matrix approach above for ordinary least squares regression. Currently, all the software the authors are aware of (e.g., SAS, PASS, nQuery), estimate logistic model power of only one predictor of interest in the presence of some number of other covariates [1, 4]. A well written and documented SAS macro intended for this scenario is the %PowerLog macro [6]. The %PowerLog macro works nicely for this scenario but is not able to estimate power for a corresponding setting as was discussed above, that is, having more than one predictor of interest in a model controlling for other covariates. Furthermore, all these methods and software require inputs that are not always user friendly to researchers and require some initial knowledge of relationships as well as preliminary calculations. The proposed approach has the user providing the conjectured odds ratios associated with each predictor and the binary outcome, in addition to the correlations among all the predictors which seems more intuitive to many users. This approach has merit since the values of regression coefficients are equal to the natural log of the odds ratio. Demidenko et al. [7], published a similar approach using odds ratios, and currently provides an online applet (http://www.dartmouth.edu/~eugened/powersamplesize.php), however, it is applicable only to one independent variable in the presence of one confounder. Therefore our proposed methods and SAS tools extend the currently available methodology so that one can power studies for multiple independent variables of interest, in the presence of multiple covariates or confounders. In the next section we outline our algorithm to estimate power for a given sample size in this manner. It is worth noting that the SAS macros LRPowerCorr10, LRPowerCorr10C, and QuickPower that use the algorithm can accommodate up to 10 predictors, X1X10. Another feature of the SAS macros is that X1 and X2 are binomial predictors, X3X6 are uniform (3,3) predictors, and X7X10 are standard normal (0,1) predictors. The investigator may use any or all of these that may fit their setting.
Methods
LRpowerCorr10 algorithm steps

1.
Define OR1OR10 (the odds ratio associated with predictors X1X10), AVEP (the average proportion of outcome Y = 1 when covariates X1 – X10 equal zero), and P, the correlation matrix of the predictors.

2.
Create W, a n x 10 data matrix by simulating n rows of ten univariate distributions with given means and standard deviations.

3.
Create Z by standardizing each element of W by subtracting the appropriate column mean and dividing by the corresponding standard deviation.

4.
Define P the correlation matrix of the 10 predictor variables. Calculate the Cholesky decomposition of P, that is, the matrix U such that U’U = P.

5.
Calculate X = Z U’

6.
Multiply each element of X by its column’s standard deviation and then add the column appropriate mean.

7.
Calculate: logit = ln(AVEP/(1AVEP)) + ln(OR1)X1 + … + ln(OR10)X10. Next calculate phat = exp(logit)/(1 + exp(logit)). Phat represents the probability that Y = 1 for a particular case.

8.
If phat is less than or equal to a random uniform (0,1) draw then Y = 1, otherwise Y = 0. This step is needed to convert a phat probability to an appropriate binary value in order to run PROC LOGISTIC.

9.
Using SAS PROC LOGISTIC, fit the full model y = X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 and save the 2 log likelihood value.

10.
Using SAS PROC LOGISTIC, fit the reduced model which has the predictors of interest omitted from the full model and save the 2 log likelihood value.

11.
Save the difference in the full and reduced model 2 log likelihood values (likelihood ratio test; LR) [8] and determine if this value is greater or equal to the appropriate critical value. If this is the case, record this single simulation run as a ‘rejection’.

12.
Repeat steps 1–10 m times and tabulate the proportion of rejections. This proportion will be the estimate of the power for the specified scenario. Experience suggests that m =100 is adequate to quickly evaluate scenarios. When a precise final power estimate is required, m =1000 provides an estimate with a standard error of about 0.01.
The %LRpowerCorr10 SAS macro
The user must define several variables as shown in Table 1. The macro variable SAMPLESIZE corresponds to the sample size that the macro is evaluating. NSIMS is the number of simulation runs required by the user, while P is the correlation among all of the predictors. AVEP is the average proportion of ‘yes’ responses (Y = 1) when all the predictor values are theoretically equal to zero. OR1 through OR10 are odds ratio values associated with the predictor variables X1X10. X1 and X2 are binomial variables with probability of success defined by PCX1 and PCX2. X3 through X6 are uniformly (3,3) distributed and X7 through X10 follow the standard normal distributions. The FULLMODEL macro variable has the user list the predictor variables in the full model. It should be noted that this is the literal script that is placed to the right of the equal sign in the model statement of the PROC LOGISTIC routine inside the macro, so care should be taken for accuracy. In a like manner, the REDUCEDMODEL variable is the list of predictors left in the model after the terms of interest are removed from the FULLMODEL list. ALPHA is the level of significance and DFTEST is the degrees of freedom for the likelihood ratio test [8]. This will correspond to the number of predictor terms of interest, that is, the difference in the number of terms in the FULLMODEL and REDUCEDMODEL lists. Users should provide a value for OR1 through OR10. If particular predictor variables are not used in a power calculation, their corresponding OR should be set to ‘1’ to avoid matrix algebra calculation problems. This point can be seen in practice in the provided examples.
The %QuickPower SAS macro
The %QuickPower macro outputs a sample size needed to achieve user specified power. The user inputs the exact same set of input variables as %LRpowerCorr10 except SAMPLESIZE. Instead of SAMPLESIZE user inputs desired POWER, for instance 0.8. In addition user inputs number of terms in the full model (NTERMSFULL) right after the reduced model is specified. This macro allows the user to get a quick approximate idea of what sample size will be required for a given scenario. It is sometimes beneficial to run this macro first to get a ball park idea of required sample size, followed by %LRpowerCorr10 macro, instead of repeating simulations in order to reach desired power.
The %LRpowerCorr10C SAS macro
The %LRpowerCorr10C macro creates an approximate power curve for a user supplied interval of sample sizes, which can be useful for grants and papers. Instead of SAMPLESIZE or POWER, user supplies the input variable LOWER and UPPER (desired sample size range) in addition to the rest of the input set for the %LRpowerCorr10 macro. LOWER is the minimum value on the horizontal axis of the output graph and UPPER is the maximum value.
User notes and cautions

1.
To minimize numerical problems that can arise from complete separation, ensure that the product n*AVEP (the product of the sample size and the average proportion where Y = 1), as well as the product n*(1 – AVEP), is at least 10.

2.
Caution and thought should go into the value(s) of OR and average sample proportion being evaluated for multiple logistic regression model power. If one evaluates OR3 = 2 along with AVEP = 0.1 in the setting in which the X3 is from the uniform (3, 3) distribution, roughly implies that the P(Y = 1) approximately doubles for each one unit increase in X3, which is not always reasonable. Thoughtful values of conjectured odds ratios are vital to the macro’s usefulness to supply meaningful sample size and power values.

3.
The %LRpowerCorr10 macro uses the LR chisquare test statistic to evaluate power [8]. Some other power approaches use the Wald chisquare test for the power evaluation [7]. These statistics have asymptotically the same type I error and are locally equivalent, however globally they are different tests so while close, they don’t always produce exactly same estimates of sample size and/or power [7]. Most statisticians would agree that the LR chisquare is generally a bit more sensitive and this implies that if one compared equivalent scenarios, it is likely that the LR chisquare approach would be slightly more powerful, but still very close.
Application and results
In the first example we demonstrate %LRpowerCorr10 macro by specifying a sample of 700 for a scenario with four independent covariates of interest X1X3 and X7, two of which are binary (X1 and X2), one uniform (X3) and one standard normal (X7), with hypothesized ORs of 1.5, 1.5, 1.1 and 1.1 in bold font below, respectively. Full model also includes 4 additional covariates, X4, X8X10. Hypothesized correlation between variables is 0.2, and P(Y = 1) = 0.1.
%LRPowerCorr10 macro example commands
After running the algorithm described above 1000 times, macro yields the power estimate of 80% with 95% CIs ranging from 77% to 82%.
%LRPowerCorr10 macro example output
In the second example we show how to use %Quickpower macro. The purpose of this macro is to provide a user with a quick sample size estimate for a given scenario. Below we specify the same model as in the first example with the same ORs. Instead of a sample size in this case we input the desired power, which is 0.8 in bold font. This macro also requires the number of variables in the full model which is 8, also in bold font. Other parameters remain the same.
%QuickPower macro example commands
The %Quickpower macro estimate of the sample size was 671. Within %Quickpower macro call this estimate was inserted into %LRpowerCorr10 macro and after running the algorithm 1000 times, macro yields the power estimate of 77% with 95% CI ranging from 74% to 80%. Since the sample size of 671 appears to be slightly underpowered we could adjust it to 700 or higher as needed, and rerun the %LRpowerCorr10 to get the power in desired range.
%QuickPower macro example output
In the third and final example we present the use and the results of the %LRpowerCorr10C macro which provides an approximate power curve for the user specified range of sample sizes. Again we use the same scenario as above for consistency purposes, and we input the sample size range from 600 to 1100, in bold font below. The rest of the parameters remain the same.
%LRPowerCorr10C macro example commands
The resulting figure below shows that a sample of 600 has a power of slightly below 75%, and as sample approaches 1100 power reaches 95%. Sample size of 700 has approximate power of 80%, therefore based on ones needs, desired sample size can be gauged (Figure 1).
Conclusions
The %LRpowerCorr10 macro and the algorithm it is based on (as well as other two algorithms proposed in this paper), shows promise to fill a void for estimating power for multivariable logistic models when multiple covariates are of interest. It is able to match the approach that researchers use for multiple regression when estimating the power of a model in which one or more predictors are of interest while controlling for a number of other variables or confounders. There doesn’t exist another tool on the market quite like this one, which allows us to power multiple independent covariates in the presence of additional variables in the model. Furthermore, unlike some other tools, inputs for the proposed algorithms are more intuitive in the form of odds ratios that most researchers are familiar with, and can test several possible magnitudes based on their assumptions. It allows us to specify the amount of correlation among all the predictors and attempt to match real data analysis settings that researchers commonly encounter.
References
SAS Institute Inc: SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.3. 2013, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
Maxwell SE: Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychol Methods. 2000, 5: 434458.
Hsieh FY, Block DA, Larsen MD: A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression. Stat Med. 1998, 17: 16231634. 10.1002/(SICI)10970258(19980730)17:14<1623::AIDSIM871>3.0.CO;2S.
Hintze J: PASS 2012. 2012, Kaysville, UT: NCSS, LLC,www.ncss.com.
Castelloe JM: Sample Size Computations and Power Analysis with the SAS System. Proceedings of the TwentyFifth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Paper 265–25. 2000, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
Friendly M: Visualizing Categorical Data. 2000, Cary, NC: SAS Institute,http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/vcd/powerlog.html.
Demidenko E: Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited. Stat Med. 2007, 26: 33853397.http://www.dartmouth.edu/~eugened/powersamplesize.php.
Shieh G: On power and sample size calculations for likelihood ratio test in generalized linear models. Biometrics. 2000, 56 (4): 11921196. 10.1111/j.0006341X.2000.01192.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Both DKW and ZB drafted the manuscript and contributed to the development of the macros. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, D.K., Bursac, Z. Three algorithms and SAS macros for estimating power and sample size for logistic models with one or more independent variables of interest in the presence of covariates. Source Code Biol Med 9, 24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/17510473924
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/17510473924