# Table 8 Presentation of examples of further modified severity assessment on Criterion A

Symptom number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Modified episode
row 1 (= {‹A1›∙Ar}) 2 5 3 0 6 2 0 4 1 (mod 7) 1
row 2 (={‹A2›∙Ar}) 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 2 3 (mod 7) 0
row 3 (= {‹A3›∙Ar}) 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 (mod 7) 0
row 4 (= {‹A4›∙Ar}) 5 4 0 2 1 0 3 0 6 (mod 7) 0
row 5 (= {‹A5›∙Ar}) 0 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 2 (mod 7) 0
row 6 (= {‹A6›∙Ar}) 1 5 3 0 1 4 0 0 1 (mod 7) 1
row 7 (= row 4) (= {‹A7›∙Ar}) 5 4 0 2 1 0 3 0 6 (mod 7) 0
row 8 (= row 2) (= {‹A8›∙Ar}) 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 2 3 (mod 7) 0
row 9 (= {‹A9›∙Ar}) 0 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 2 (mod 7) 0
row 10 (= row 4) (= {‹A10›∙Ar}) 5 4 0 2 1 0 3 0 6 (mod 7) 0
Total sum 18 38 14 13 18 6 9 11 30   5
Averages 1.8 3.8 1.4 1.3 1.8 0.6 0.9 1.1 3.0   0.2
1. The indication for item selection as being effective; Ar = [11|02|13|04|15|16|17|08|19||0 10 |0 11 |0 12 |…] (mod 2) over Table 3
2. A further modified (sub)scale based on Criterion A is presented. Here, the first, third, sixth, seventh and ninth items are effective. The order of effectiveness via selection of items is Ar = [σ123456789||0 10 |0 11 |0 12 |…] (mod 2) = [11|02|13|04|15|16|17|08|19||0 10 |0 11 |0 12 |…] (mod 2). If the j-th row (in this case, j = 1,2,3,…10) in Table 3 is expressed as ‹Aj›, then the modified (sub)scale is provided by the inner product ‹Aj› ∙ Ar, where effective items are denoted by the value 1 and ineffective items by the value 0. The omitted display for the j-th row is given by {‹Aj› ∙ Ar}. If the components with σi = 0 are used at this time; however, these ineffective results of assessments are expected to be stored implicitly and can be pulled out as explicit data when needed in, for example, a future upgrade of criteria of the DSM. The extreme right column indicates the presence/absence of a ‘modified episode’ relating to item selection of Criterion A when the episode needs four of six symptoms for the diagnosis, with at least one of them being symptom (1)